Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login

Is illegal porn like Child pornography and Beastiality (human having sex with animals) considered fine if its animated? 

1,341 deviants said Nope thats NOT FINE!
417 deviants said Yup thats fine!

Devious Comments

HearseGurl Featured By Owner Aug 2, 2014
Not Okay
yozoru Featured By Owner Aug 25, 2013  Hobbyist
No matter what laws you enforce onto the media, people will always find a way around those laws to publish sick, nasty things. So it wouldn't make a difference either way.
AndGodCalledMeWoman6 Featured By Owner Dec 5, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Right. People are smart, they'll find loopholes no matter what.
ilickrainbows Featured By Owner Aug 5, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
i think its fine because i dont give a f@#$ about it
Giraffeshadows1234 Featured By Owner Jul 31, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
No i canh 
SalmonSuzie Featured By Owner May 13, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I think it is fine, because for example it could help pedophiles to 'satisfy their needs' without hurting anyone. It might just help the world get rid of a few more rapists.
LmonLimeCat Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2015
It would fuel them actually. Most of the rapists out there watched some form of porn that involved nonconsent. Pedophiles who molest children watched child pornography. It just makes them want to actually do it for themselves.
SalmonSuzie Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2015  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
My thoughts were actually that this stuff would only be available for people who already feel like they are solely attracted to children. There was this documentary I saw once on some guy who was a paedophile but chose to never hurt any child. I wouldn't distribute animations like those to "regular" people, if that were the case I'd definitely agree with you on that.
LmonLimeCat Featured By Owner Nov 21, 2015
If someone is a pedophile but refuses to act on his emotions, then he's doing the right thing.
Watching child pornography will not help his cause. Children cannot consent. Regardless of whether or 
not it is animated, the children in the film are not legally able to give consent because they are not old
enough to give it nor understand the consequences. There's a reason why people can get arrested for having
child pornography on their computers, and it's not just because the children in those videos were abused. The people
watching did not take part in the making of the film, but because they are getting off on watching children being sexually 
abused shows that they have disregard for the childrens' welfare and can reenact it themselves. I suppose that doesn't 
necessarily mean that they WILL do it, but there is the threat of it occurring, and we must uphold the safety of children
above the sexual desires of adults.

Take it this way. Someone I know, when she was little, had her father jailed because he was caught watching child pornography.
One of the girls in the video looked exactly like her, and the police were afraid that she had been forced to take part. Would you feel
safe knowing that your father enjoyed looking at a child who looked just like you being violated? Would you be able to sleep easy at night knowing 
that one day he could slip into your room and do the same to you? Personally I say, if you are a pedophile, what you need is professional help. 
Criminal psychologists do not tell their rapists to watch videos of women/men being raped in order to restrain their emotions. They do not tell
their killers to watch people being murdered to help them. Criminals need to stay AWAY from the things that attracts them to go down the immoral
highway. Pedophilia is a psychosexual disorder, and it needs treatment. The people suffering from this disorder usually feel like it was against their
wishes to have it, so imo I think it would be tremendously helpful for them to recover from the disorder rather than feeding it and trying to keep it
at bay. If you could either treat the symptoms for HIV/AIDS or cure it altogether, which would you chose? Food for thought.
Sorry for the long ass reply it got out of hand lol  Britney Spears Don't Get It 
SalmonSuzie Featured By Owner Nov 22, 2015  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Wooooow okay but wait! Of course the visual content shown has to be fake! (animated) It'd be so wrong to show real life child abuse! I'd never ever approve of that, naturally. 
I just thought maybe something animated would help. It's not like I'd be glad to spread stuff like that into the world, but I think it may do some good. Although I'm not sure why entirely.
I understand your fears of people thinking it'd be okay to do such things though. But I do feel like people wouldn't get triggered by stuff they see on tv that much to be honest. It'd be the same as seeing someone get murdered in a movie and then thinking "hey, I should murder someone today". Well, a little bit like that I suppose.

About the person you know, you're right. I would be afraid that that man would do something like that. I guess that's also because he has kids himself which makes it just more disgusting, to be honest. Although on the other hand, if the man was never caught watching the pornography, maybe he wouldn't have been jailed at all until something terrible had happened. I don't know if this is too rude of me, I'm sorry if that's the case. I wouldn't mean to offend you in regard to your friend.
I do agree that paedophiles need help, of course. But how do you recognise a pedophile? How do you know which people are? I feel like the visual content could help recognise pedophilia in someone too, if i.e. the police were to find out someone watches it. No real kids get hurt and you can find pedophiles with it too, if you look at it that way.

You're right about this part though, that murderers aren't told to watch animations of people getting murdered to be able to restrain themselves. 
I'm not entirely sure about pedophilia being a disorder like that. I don't know, I hope it is and I hope it is "curable" but it seems so impossible to me. That's why I can't really say if it's to be "treated" or "cured". But if it really is scientifically proven a disorder and I just don't know about that fact, then of course curing is the solution.

Sorry from my part, too!
Weaselhatter Featured By Owner Apr 26, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Things like that is something that doesn't need to be promoted in a world like this. The only condition that can stretch at times is manga that shows two guys having sex and one happens to be young. Sometimes too young for the audience, used for certain viewers who care for certain forms of romance. Other then that it really borderlines an obsessity that can be viewed as very dangerous and disturbing.
ppbus Featured By Owner Jan 10, 2013
So the child and the animal are actually two adults who are shape-shifters, there, solved. If saying "not fine" has no legal implications than I could board that boat too. If "not fine" means it shouldn't be legal then that's ridiculous...
Hevfas Featured By Owner Dec 19, 2012   General Artist
isnt it still porn whether its animated or not?
GreenGem64 Featured By Owner Dec 14, 2012
Well if its an animated show its fine. But if it was with real people, then we got a problem. So people, calm down, it's an animation. You should be complaining about real child porn, instead of animations today.
death-groupie-1233 Featured By Owner Dec 12, 2012
Legally speaking, no. Morally speaking, yes.
AndersHedstrom Featured By Owner Dec 11, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
Animated child porn doesn't hurt anyone, so it shouldn't be illegal. Even if it's gross.
LmonLimeCat Featured By Owner Feb 24, 2013
If you watch child pornography, you obviously have mental issues. That's my only problem with it.
AndersHedstrom Featured By Owner Feb 24, 2013  Professional Digital Artist
Of course. I'm not defending child porn.
lucas420 Featured By Owner Dec 11, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
im okay with any fetish as long as its llustrated.
XOrdinary1998 Featured By Owner Dec 11, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
NO! It's absolutely NOT fine!!
Jfdp13 Featured By Owner Dec 11, 2012  Student General Artist
XOrdinary1998 Featured By Owner Dec 13, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
Wow, dude. :stare:
Jfdp13 Featured By Owner Dec 13, 2012  Student General Artist
"Wow" what?
Caretaker-of-Myth Featured By Owner Dec 10, 2012
Hahaha woooow, people are weird. They think that watching actual videos of actual people having sex is fine and not cheating, but watching an animated drawing with no real people at all involved is wrong? For me it's the opposite. My partner can watch all the cel-shaded drawings and read all the printed words he wants, but if he ever moved on to a picture of an actual person I'd be livid. It's a matter of respecting actual people.
Keyshe54 Featured By Owner Dec 10, 2012   Traditional Artist
It's better, but still can be dangerous. It still will encourage those feelings/desires. Depending on what film/cartoon's content/intent it could be very bad.
PyrokidSosa Featured By Owner Dec 9, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
there's just some things you shouldn't do loool
pathwreck Featured By Owner Dec 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
people who constantly and willingly watch cartoons with children engaged in sexual acts are pedophiles in denial. there is no reason why children should be depicted in any sexual act designed for willing or consenting adults.
yvonne84 Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Student Traditional Artist
I don't think (imho) that child pornography and beastiality are on the same place on the scale of "gross and sick".
I don't think child porn should be animated at all, but I have no problem with somebody animating a dog riding up someones leg. Still gross though.
turusai Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Of course those things are always wrong 0_0
I can't believe anyone would argue child porn is ok, regardless of format :noes:

It's not a healthy state of mind. Obviously the animation in itself cannot cause harm (it's pictures) it's the mentality behind things like child porn & beastiality that is really unhealthy, & any form of encouragement/acceptance including films (whether animated or otherwise) is not ok. To some extent it normalises these acts (& as mentioned previously) in the case of animation, it can create a distorted perception that these acts are enjoyed by all involved, which is completely untrue.

I really worry about humanity, arguing that child porn or beastiality is ok is so sick. I don't even know what else to say @_@\
KorukiKonaru Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012
Personally, while I'm usually fairly liberal in nature I would have to say no. I admit I support censorship on certain things, and I just don't think child porn/bestiality is ok even in an animated scenario.
Harmony283 Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
I think like a lot of people said (at least on the first page of comments): It's much safer for a pedophile or a person who's interested in bestiality to be able to have a medium in which they can experience it (animated) without harming an individual (or animal). It's one of those instances where it's not 'hurting' anyone (unless the person making the animations actually have had sex with a child/animal before, but then that's more THEM than it is the animation I'd think)

Ironically enough some places say it's totally cool for you to have sex with your goat or pig .__. (though generally speaking I think they'd still get charged for it haha)
SoloSyndrome Featured By Owner Dec 9, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
^You got it! :)
WinonaFlammery Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012
Honestly, I see nothing wrong with it. The animation hurts no one, and I'm liberal; as long as no one is hurt, anything goes.
Some people are pedophiles, some like bestiality, and frankly, I don't think it's right to take even the animated porn from them. It's not their fault they have deviant tastes, and we're all human. So I'd rather have them watch the animated stuff than real stuff where someone was actually hurt.
silver-escape Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
if no real children or animals were used then it's fine. if you don't like it then don't watch
Soriyns-Knight Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Student General Artist
It may still be considered weird, but in the same way that extremely violent films aren't considered to be murder, I wouldn't consider stuff that's fictional to be on the same or even near the same level as something that did actual harm to a child or animal in it's creation. I'm fine with people doing or making anything they want as long as it does no harm to any actually people.
NY-Knux Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012
The whole reason its illegal is because it has negative effects towards children. And I mean, like, SERIOUS negative effects towards children.

The reason beastiality is illegal is because animals can't give consent, and is many cases, the human gets seriously hurt.

Animation completely negates these reasons...

I'm not into that sort of thing, but I can understand how animation is not a bad thing at all.
Bleachbender Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I wouldn't call it fine, but I tolerate it.(so voted no)
As someone who likes violence in fiction because it's just fiction and not real I would feel like a hypocrite to say other kind of horrible things are not ok.
And it's not like someone who enjoys these things is automatically going to harm other people.

As said I like gore an splattery stuff but in Real life I can't even kill a butterfly on my own.

On the other side the problem of consuming any kind of this stuff can lead to someone getting so used to it that they are no longer able to tell what's appropriate outside of their fantasy and what not.
Which again leads to the question, does someone become pedo/violent etc because of the things he consumes, or does he consume them because he already has a tendency for it.
For example my mother is appalled by anything rather violent and anything that has monsters (even when it's Monsters Inc. no joke) so she would never even look at it anyway.

So someone who likes shota/loli would just to watch it already need a tendency to like it anyway.
AdioSlave Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I dont support that kind of thing
hyenacub Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I don't like it, and think it's sick (though as for Bestiality, if the animals aren't being harmed and the people like it, I got no problem with them doing it) but...if there's the chance it might keep people from making or buying the real kind...I say they should do it. It'd be nice if the animated kind would blot out the real kind. Doubtful...but it'd still be nice.
UndefinedError Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Yes it's fine. As long as you're not harming anyone, do what tickles your fancy. I don't see anything wrong with it at all. Life is short and you only live once, people should worry about more important things.
SonicWolvelina99 Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I picked no, just sayin'.

However, it's not harming anyone since it's animated. But if someone becomes a rapist or something then that's the person's fault not the cartoon. And IMHO, we wouldn't be able to or at least, it'd be hard to control our urges without some sort of outlet of sexual tension other than masturbation. That's kinda the point of porn.

Remember, other than dolphins, (and some more animals I forgot) we are the only species that actually feel pleasure during sex. We are more of an empathy-oriented species.

So, in the end, everything in moderation. If you don't want to then you don't want to.

I don't wanna see Beastiality or Child Pornography, even if it's animated.
Retro-D64 Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
187 People are fucked up .... really doesnt surprise me tbh
ApplejackMan Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Student Digital Artist
WHO WOULD WANNA ANIMATE THAT!? lol any, it ain't fine. Soon cartoons won't be enough, unless this man can keep the "upper head" lol (get it) and think logically. Anyway, umm... Your almost past sane when you wanna do animals.

I don't care what other people do as long as it doesn't effect others around me.
heather-may Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I don't think child porn could ever be right, just thinking about the question makes me feel sick. Although I do find things like Jimmy Saville jokes funny, but i think that's a little different maybe.
As for beastiality, I just think it's really weird that a human would want to be intimate with an animal...
Sprits Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
Well Bleedman for one is getting away with it right?
Ry-Spirit Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
Sprits Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Professional Digital Artist

...i know you can probably handle it, but proceed with caution all the same
dragonfriend7738 Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012
The fact that you have to rely upon a satirical and troll-ridden opinion-editorial site says much about how you see things and explain them to others.

... Just saying, since you can probably handle it, and all.
Sprits Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
Not stating my opinion here, neither am I claiming it's a well-written or trustworthy website, but hey, he DID draw those things right?
dragonfriend7738 Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012
With all the different art thieves and copiers, it is entirely possible that he did not draw them; but that is beyond the point. Yes the images in his style exist. Yes, it is likely that he drew them. However, using a site that is filled with hate and venom rather than calm, rational speech, detracts from an argument and turns it into an attempt to affect someone's emotions rather than their intellect.

If you had simply said "Bleedman is an artist known for drawing remakes of children's cartoons and comics, and some of his art involves loli porn," you would have answered the question and passed your opinion of him along, given your previous comments on the subject.
Add a Comment:

Poll History